ICAI Board of Discipline Acquits Mumbai CA in 17-Year-Old CBI-Linked Misconduct Case
The Board of Discipline under the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), set up under Section 21A of the Chartered Accountants Act 1949, has issued a confidential report regarding the case of CA. Bipin Babubhai Shah (M. No. 016862), Mumbai. The Board comprises CA Rajendra Kumar P (Presiding Officer), Ms Dolly Chakrabarty (Government Nominee), and CA Priti Savla (Member). The final hearing on the matter was held on July 29, 2025, at CAI Tower, Mumbai, and the Respondent attended in person. Now the case is concluded.
Background of Case:
The case (bearing no. RC ACl 2008A 0001) is related to a CBI criminal case registered in 2008 against several individuals, including CA Shah, Shri Ashutosh Verma (then Deputy Director of Income Tax Investigations), businessman Shri Suresh Nanda, and his son. The charges included conspiracy, corruption, destruction of evidence, cheating, and other offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The CBI alleged that in 2007-2008, Shah and others conspired to manipulate an Income Tax report to favour the Nanda family (Shri Suresh Nanda and his associates, Shri Ashutosh Verma). They allegedly coordinated with Verma to destroy evidence, dilute findings, and avoid legal consequences.
Investigations uncovered that the Respondent and Shri Aushutosh Verma have met several times, especially on 22.02.2008, 23.02.2008, and 04.03.2008, to discuss the report. The seized phone calls and SMS communications during meetings between Shah, Verma, and the Nandas in February-March 2008, including a secret meeting at Hotel J.W. Marriott. A three-hour recorded conversation on March 04, 2008, allegedly showed Shah and Verma discussing bribes worth an estimated 10 lakhs and report alterations. The recording was verified, and witnesses identified the voices.
Reported Charge:
- Chartered Accountant (CA) Shah is alleged to have helped Verma reduce Suresh Nanda’s tax liability during the years 2007-2008, which amounts to tax evasion.
Response from CA Shah:
The Chartered Accountant Shah has submitted his written statement denying all the alleged charges made against him via an email, dated March 15, 2025, pointing out that the Special Court found no evidence that Verma altered the report on his laptop at Shah’s request. He also argued that the disciplinary case was started after 17 years, which is an extremely long delay. This delay, he said, made it difficult to defend himself because crucial evidence may be lost or unavailable. Shah requested that the case be dropped under Rule 12 of the Chartered Accountants Rules, which allows dismissal if a case is too delayed.
Board’s Observations:
The Board agreed that there was a long and unexplained delay (events in 2008, first notice in 2018, total delay of approximately 17 years). They also noted the Special Court’s finding that there was no evidence of Shah’s involvement in altering the report. Considering these facts, the Board decided that continuing the proceedings would not be fair.
Conclusion:
After considering the option of the board, the authority ruled that the Respondent is ‘Not Guilty’ of Other Misconduct falling within the meaning of Item (2) of Part IV of the First Schedule of the Chartered Accountants Act 1949. They clarified that this decision only applies to the delay and does not judge the criminal case or its facts.
